Have a Research Question?
Have a Research Question?
The Growth Management Act (GMA) is a series of state statutes, first adopted in 1990, that requires fast-growing cities and counties to develop a comprehensive plan to manage their population growth. It is primarily codified under Chapter 36.70A RCW, although it has been amended and added to in several other parts of the RCW.
Under RCW 36.70A.020, the GMA establishes a series of 15 goals that should act as the basis of all comprehensive plans. The GMA specifically notes in the statute that the goals "are not listed in order of priority and shall be used exclusively for the purpose of guiding the development of comprehensive plans and development regulations." Below you will find a list of those goals along with an abbreviated description (for the full descriptions, see RCW 36.70A.020).
The Washington State Department of Commerce is the primary state-level contact for GMA-related issues. They provide technical assistance to help local governments comply with the GMA and implement their comprehensive plans effectively.
Based on the requirements in RCW 36.70A.040, 18 counties, and all the cities and towns within them, are required to "fully plan" under the GMA. An additional 11 counties had originally opted to fully plan, although one county (Ferry County) later opted out under EHB 1224 (2014), which gave counties under 20,000 population the option to opt out by December 31, 2015. The 28 "fully planning" counties make up about 95% of the state's population. Per SB 5457 (2023), RCW 36.70A.130 allows cities with populations under 500 people to fully opt out of comprehensive planning under “some circumstances.”
The 10 counties that opted to “fully plan” must plan according to the same requirements as the fully planning counties. The 11 counties that are not required to “fully plan” must just plan for critical areas and natural resource land only under the GMA.
The GMA establishes the comprehensive plan as the centerpiece of local long-range planning, which contains a vision, goals, objectives, policies, and implementation actions that are intended to guide day-to-day decisions by elected officials and local government staff. For information on the comprehensive planning process, see our Comprehensive Planning page.
Under the GMA, the state Office of Financial Management (OFM) develops population projections for the state and each county (see OFM's GMA county projections). Each "fully planning" county is then mandated to determine, in consultation with cities, where that growth should be directed to occur. Once these growth projections are adopted, then the county and cities are to use them in their comprehensive planning processes and make sure that their plans can accommodate the projected level of growth (RCW 36.70A.115).
This process involves reviewing urban growth areas (UGAs), which are areas where “urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature” (RCW 36.70A.110). Based on OFM population projections, UGAs and zoning densities within them should be set to accommodate growth that is projected to occur in the county or city over the next 20 years, although they can provide additional capacity to accommodate a “reasonable land market supply factor” (RCW 36.70A.110(2)).
The GMA was amended in 2021 to require that designated cities also identify the capacity and actions needed to accommodate future housing growth within four household income categories (based on U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department guidelines using Average Median Income, or AMI): moderate (80-95% AMI), low (50-80% AMI), very low (30-50%), and extremely low (
If the UGA review determines that future growth can’t be accommodated within the existing boundaries of the UGA, or the UGA’s developable lands exceeds future growth projects, the UGA may be changed subject to certain requirements such as limitations on floodplain areas and national historic reserves. In 2024, the GMA was amended to allow additional conditions under which UGAs may be revised (SSB 5834). Counties are responsible for designating, expanding, and reducing UGA boundaries, although they are required to consult with the cities in their determinations.
Areas within the UGA but outside city or town boundaries should be addressed by the adjacent city and the county through the county-wide planning policies process. Outside the UGA, cities and towns are limited in the actions they can take regarding those areas. For example, cities are highly limited in their ability to extend utilities and other governmental services outside the UGA (RCW 36.70A.110(4)).
While all "fully planning" counties are required to conduct land capacity analyses to ensure their UGAs can accommodate future growth, Clark, King, Kitsap, Pierce, Snohomish, Thurston, and Whatcom counties also have to submit Buildable Lands reports that look back at actual development to determine if cities and counties have designated adequate amounts of residential, commercial, and industrial lands to meet the growth needs incorporated in their comprehensive plans (see Commerce's Buildable Lands page).
For more information on UGAs, see the Department of Commerce’s Urban Growth Area Guidebook (2012).
Under the GMA, all cities and counties - even if they are not subject to comprehensive planning - are directed to designate natural resource lands (including those related to forestry, agriculture, fisheries, and mining) and identify steps to preserve them. For more information, see the Department of Commerce's Natural Resource Lands page.
In addition, all cities and counties in Washington are also required to adopt critical areas regulations. As defined in RCW 36.70A.030(6):
"Critical areas" include the following areas and ecosystems: (a) Wetlands; (b) areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water; (c) fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas; (d) frequently flooded areas; and (e) geologically hazardous areas. "Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas" does not include such artificial features or constructs as irrigation delivery systems, irrigation infrastructure, irrigation canals, or drainage ditches that lie within the boundaries of and are maintained by a port district or an irrigation district or company.
In 2023, SSB 5374 amended RCW 36.70A.060 allowing a city of fewer than 25,000 people to adopt their county’s GMA critical area regulations by reference. Counties and cities are required to include the best available science in developing policies and development regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas (RCW 36.70A.172).
For more information, see our page on Critical Areas and the Department of Commerce's page on Critical Areas, including their useful Critical Areas Handbook (2023).
The Growth Management Hearings Board resolves disputes concerning comprehensive plans and development regulations adopted under the GMA. The board is made up of five members (RCW 36.70A.250)
Challenges to the GMA are heard by a three-member panel comprised of two members residing in the geographic area of a challenge (Eastern Washington, Central Puget Sound, and Western Washington), with one acting as the presiding officer. A third member is drawn from one of the other regions. Each hearing panel must include “a member admitted to practice law in the state,” a former city or county elected official, and must “reflect the political composition of the board” (RCW 36.70A.260).
The governor has the authority to impose sanctions on cities, counties, and state agencies that do not comply with the GMA, as determined by the Growth Management Hearings Board (RCW 36.70A.340-.345). Sanctions may include withholding or temporarily rescinding the authority to collect portions of one or more of the following:
The Growth Management Hearings Board website contains numerous resources, including a handbook (2023) for practicing before the board and digests of decisions (2023).
